Telephone Games With LLMs
An AI-generated summary of an AI-generated summary, with further analysis with other LLMs.
I don't disagree with any of the analysis or that it has been hallucinated. Much of the context was provided by me so it is analyzing my explanations of the entries. Hallucinations are probably more likely if the user chooses a longer analysis with less context. It will do what's necessary to connect dots and isn't being malicious. It just means that we have to be mindful of what's in the datasets and what dots could potentially be connected. I like to use the analogy of my Atmosphere Generation project from the late 90s where I would create collections of sounds, burn them onto a CD, make 3 copies of it, and put them in 3 separate CD players, each with its own set of speakers, arrange them around a room, and put them on shuffle play. So I would have to give consideration of what sounds would clash with other sounds. Sounds that had rhythmic patterns in them would clash with other patterns, so I would have to put them on a separate disc. In the case of audio generated from LLMs, they often garble words, which may make the transcript incorrect. I noticed that it garbled numbers frequently so I couldn't attest to their accuracy.
The other issue I have with the analysis of the Dynaxioms is precisely the dot-connecting. They were never organized by topic, although I would sometimes group them if possible. If I write 10 entries in a month it doesn't mean any of them are related to one another at all. One could be about music and one could be about psychology and it would connect them, whereas I wouldn't, which is actually interesting. It's like someone seeing something you didn't see.
There is also the effect of how a prompt was written. Just as we can ask leading questions we can write leading prompts. If you feed the results back into the LLM, all questions you ask in the future will be influenced by it. It's essentially a continuous training, and the LLM will become something else. With Google NotebookLM, you have to be mindful of what previous results have been fed back in as sources and whether they are checked or unchecked when you run queries. The error I always cite is that AI is like nuclear weapons--something Elon Musk said but was attributed to me because none of the sources checked had his name in it, so they attributed it to me. I never said it. I alluded to it, so it's an "allucination"
Understanding Patterns Through Context
Entry 3351 posits that true patterns require examining what preceded them, as viewing only the immediate moment leads to a lack of context and a feeling of "strobing." This is illustrated with a musical analogy: a single repeating quarter note in a bar is merely strobing, but adding more notes to create a richer rhythm, like a quarter note followed by two eighth notes in a two-four bar, allows the listener's brain to perceive a more complex pattern. To fully grasp a pattern, the source suggests looking at four bars prior and two bars after, then repeating the eight-bar phrase, emphasizing that insight depth depends on the scope of embraced context. Entry 3355 builds on this by stating that melody transforms simple rhythm into a riff, requiring at least two distinct tones to move beyond a basic cyclical pattern to a more complex and memorable form. Together, these entries suggest that complexity and interest arise from providing simple elements with sufficient context.
[It is true that the wider the "context window" the more we can understand smaller details. In music the choice of scale (the horizontal) is determined by knowing what's in the vertical view across the horizontal. If you can know more about the multi-story buildings on a block the more you know about what a new building should look like. The late Frank Gehry used this schema when he designed his house in Santa Monica by overlaying elements from other elements on his block, but in his case, he broke all the rules of typology. We can do this in music as well where we more efficiently break the rules by more intimately knowing them].
Using one quarter note per bar (or just quarter notes) to create a wider context with a natural "mirror"
The Role of Introduction and Commitment in Knowledge Acquisition
Entry 3352 argues that knowledge requires an external trigger for curiosity, contradicting the idea of innate, universal curiosity. It suggests that learning is often driven by accidental introductions, such as a friend recommending a dish leading to an interest in Indian food or picking up a guitar at a friend's house sparking an interest in playing music. This highlights how the environment can create opportunities for curiosity. Entry 3356 then asserts that the world is built by individuals who commit knowledge to memory, implying that a decline in memorization leads to a diminished world. It further refines this by stating that the internet and AI increase potential knowledge but emphasize the need for a compelling reason to commit information to memory, distinguishing between mere access and internalized understanding.
"Discuss access points"
The Paradox of Identity and Perception
Entry 3353, stating "The religious are the most special people in the world," is interpreted within the context of other entries as suggesting that belief provides a resilient internal structure and a cohesive framework for understanding reality, requiring immense commitment. Entry 3354 addresses the paradox of self-perception, where others may see significant change in an individual, yet that individual perceives their identity as constant. This entry suggests that either the changes were always present but unseen by the observer, or the individual has genuinely transformed while maintaining an internal sense of continuity. Entry 3358 describes life as an ever-changing terrain of moods, creating a tension between a static internal self and a dynamic external experience. Synthesizing these points reveals that while one's core self may feel constant, experiences are defined by shifting moods, impacting motivation even when aware of an activity's importance.
[If we were all self-deprecating we'd wouldn't want to have special treatment. Religions can create social cohesion but there is still a powerful influence of both the ego and the superego--as opposed to being completely secular where group beliefs are kept below the surface for the purpose of getting along. Some topics are out of bounds as a form of etiquette, like not talking about politics or religion].
The Impact of AI and Memes on Originality and Conformity
Entry 3357 warns that increased use of generative AI can lead to individuals becoming more AI-generated themselves, not through moral judgment but through input-output loops. The concern is that AI-generated characteristics in one's own content can be fed back into training models, leading to synthesized echoes rather than original thought. This is likened to a composer using AI-generated content, where the core idea is not from their unique human experience. Entry 3360 defines memes as "unquestioned conformity," arguing they bypass rational thought by exploiting fast, emotional processing to trigger immediate tribal agreement and a sense of belonging. The synthesis of these entries highlights how AI can dilute originality through unconscious feedback loops, while memes drive conformity through instinctual tribal appeal, both challenging independent thought and the authenticity of modern communication.
[Precisely. All of this prose is the voice of AI. At the moment, Google only has 2 TTS American English voices, but that might change in the future. The cadence of the voice itself adds to the "truthiness" of something. We naturally associate truth with personality: If we like the way a person's voice sounds, the more likely we accept everything they say, i.e. "unquestioned conformity".]
The Unforeseeable Nature of Human Innovation
Entry 3359 reflects on the concept of "unthinkable things," noting that historically, many things once deemed unimaginable have come to pass, citing the date 10205 [10/2025] as an example. This suggests that human creativity represents a blind spot, with a tension between the perceived limits of imagination and the reality of human capacity for creation and destruction. The boundary of the unthinkable is constantly being pushed, and humanity is perpetually unable to foresee future breakthroughs that redefine existence. This observation underscores the constant self-induced surprise inherent in human innovation.
"Discuss real life and 'reel' life"
Synthesizing Foundational Concepts for Meaningful Knowledge
The AI-Summary (not mine)
The analysis begins by emphasizing the necessity of context for understanding patterns and complexity, as seen in musical analogies where scope creates depth. This need for context extends to self-understanding, where the paradox of a constant self navigating shifting moods over time requires examining patterns of emotions to grasp current desires. The importance of genuine introduction to knowledge, as highlighted in 3352, and the commitment to memory driven by relevant reasons, as stated in 3356, are presented as crucial for world-shaping knowledge. However, the digital age challenges this, with memes promoting instinctual conformity and AI creating synthesized echoes, potentially leading to echo chambers rather than original thought. The concluding thought prompts reflection on the origin of interests, questioning whether they stem from personal discovery or tribal consumption, and how to ensure committed knowledge is truly one's own thought process rather than a digital reflection.
The second go-around with my comments woven in :
***
- Entry 3351 emphasizes the importance of context, suggesting that true patterns in knowledge require understanding prior information. Limited perspectives lead to "strobing," which is repetition without meaning.
- The analogy of music illustrates this concept: a single repeated note lacks depth, whereas a broader view incorporating multiple notes creates meaningful relationships and patterns. [As opposed to using a single quarter note on different beats in a bar or two beamed eighth notes across the bar line, which gives you another level of variation.]
- The depth of insight is directly tied to the size of one’s contextual framework; a wider view reveals richer narratives and connections.
- Entry 3352 posits that knowledge requires an introduction or external cue, challenging the notion of innate curiosity. Our environment can spark new interests, such as trying unfamiliar cuisines.
- Entry 3356 asserts that societal progress hinges on the collective memory of individuals. The quality of internalized knowledge, not just the quantity of accessible data, shapes our understanding and interactions.
- The risk of "maximum strobing" emerges when introductions abound but commitment to memory is lacking, leading to superficial engagement with information.
- Entry 3354 explores the paradox of identity, where individuals perceive themselves as unchanged over time, despite external perceptions of significant transformation.
- Entry 3358 highlights the dynamic nature of internal experiences, suggesting that while identity feels static, external circumstances and personal desires are constantly shifting.
- The interplay between a fixed sense of self and an evolving environment complicates how we perceive change and continuity in our lives.
- In entry 3357, the author warns that reliance on generative AI can dilute originality, as human outputs begin to reflect AI patterns, eroding personal creativity.
- The metaphor of AI as a mirror illustrates how our ideas may inadvertently echo back AI-generated content, leading to unrecognized conformity in thought.
- Entry 3360 defines memes as a form of unquestioned conformity, exploiting emotional responses to foster group belonging, thus contributing to the erosion of critical thinking in digital spaces.
- Entry 3359 suggests that creativity is limited by our inability to foresee breakthroughs, emphasizing the fluid boundary of what is considered possible.
- This ongoing expansion of potential highlights the need for individuals to remain conscious of their creative capacities and the influences shaping their thinking.
- The overarching message stresses the importance of maintaining a commitment to original thought and awareness of contextual influences in the digital age.
Comments